I’m not sure
why it took me so many years to realise that I shared a birthday with Emily
Brontë – July 30th. Even in years
when I have taught Wuthering Heights
on our Victorian Literature course I never made the connection, presumably
because I was trained in modes of literary interpretation – at first New
Critical and Leavisite, subsequently literary-theoretical – which never had
much time for authorial biography in the first place. In later life, biography has come
to seem a more important and moving genre to me, so I have finally made that
Pinkney-Brontë linkage, presumably the only one there is.
However, the issue of Emily Brontë and her
novel – or, more generally, of the Brontës and their novels – does pose some
theoretically interesting questions. For if we take the Brontës’ fiction as being
representative of that wider literary trend we now often term ‘female
Gothic’, running say from Anne Radcliffe to Angela Carter and beyond, then I
have never felt sure that I could convincingly articulate the relationship of
this cultural tendency to that architectural and ultimately political Gothic
which characterises the thinking of John Ruskin and William Morris. Paranoid entrapment in a confined masculinist
space, coupled with an unleashing of female desire, sits uneasily with
admiration for the sensuous creativity of the carvers of the medieval cathedral
and the adoption of that model of labour as a utopian alternative to the
degraded and oppressive work practices of the capitalist present.
Are these
two traditions imbricated in ways which we haven’t yet managed to define or
theorise? Will it always be the case that
the powerful invocation of one kind of Gothic will also, at the level of the
textual unconscious, emit unsettling traces of the other? And might that be the reason why Morris’s
embodiment of Gothic utopianism in News
from Nowhere, which has plenty of ebullient socialist carvers of its own,
also unleashes, in the latter third of the text, the energetic and enigmatic
figure of Ellen, who has by her own admission ‘often troubled men’s minds
disastrously’, and whom in the end the book hardly seems to know what to do
with?
No comments:
Post a Comment