In his essay
on ‘Feudal England’, Morris distinguishes three strands within medieval
poetry. First, the writings of Chaucer;
second, the ballads of the people; and third, what he terms ‘Lollard poetry, the great
example of which is William Langland’s Piers
Plowman. It is no bad corrective to
Chaucer, and in form at least belongs
wholly to the popular side; but it seems to me to show symptoms of the spirit
of the rising middle class’. Today Langland’s
great poem seems to be making something of a comeback, with a Cambridge Companion to Piers Plowman
appearing in 2014, and Routledge has just reissued two earlier works on the
poem: Stan Hussey’s 1969 collection Piers
Plowman: Critical Approaches and Myra Stokes’s monograph Justice
and Mercy in Piers Plowman from 1984.
As a newly
appointed lecturer at Bristol University, Myra Stokes taught me medieval
literature in 1977-78. She won great
credence from us undergraduates by announcing in one seminar that she had been
awake most of the previous night worrying about narrative problems in Chaucer,
and she prudently warned me when I was contemplating postgraduate study not to
become a medievalist (despite my love for Sir
Gawain and the Grene Knight) because there just weren’t enough jobs in the
field. There are even fewer now, of
course.
To Stan
Hussey I owe a still larger debt, since he was chair of the appointing panel
that gave me my Lancaster post in 1989. He
retired in 1990 (after once complaining that I was breaking the departmental
budget with postage for my journal News
from Nowhere), though he looked in occasionally, as an increasingly frail
figure, in later years. He died in 2004,
still working on his definitive edition of the fourteenth-century mystic Walter
Hilton. Stan reviewed Myra Stokes’s book
when it first came out, genially describing it as ‘an old-fashioned explication, and none the worse for that’. Both of them adhered to a broad, humane
concept of medieval studies that opened into history of the language and
stylistics, so Stan also wrote on Shakespeare and Myra on Jane Austen.
I'm very
glad that significant books by these two fine academics are in circulation
again, and still feel, as I have said before in this blog, that the Morris
Society has a particular responsibility to the field of medieval literature
which it hasn’t yet fulfilled, or perhaps even fully recognised.
2 comments:
Steven Justice has argued that "William Morris has diagnosed 'Piers Plowman' as an epiphenomenon of its moment ... and for that reason could use it to help conjure the utopian future of [his] 'News from Nowhere'" (p.57). I wonder if that general claim about Morris's utopia could be substantiated in real textual detail.
I was taught by Myra Stokes at Bristol from 2000 - she was a wonderful teacher, even if though I never really got to grips with Olde English. Her biggest influence on me was saying I would never get a First - a 2.1 was achievable, at best - which lit a fire in me to prove her wrong (which I did!). On reflection, it was a clever way to get me to work a bit harder and be more considered in my writing. Glad to say it worked.
Post a Comment