Friday, 30 April 2021

Utopians in Oxford

Let us try to recall our very first reading of Morris’s utopia where, as William Guest, Dick and Clara set off by boat from Hammersmith Guest House, we were not yet sure of what the final destination of this upriver journey may be.  The only critic I know who has ventured at all in this direction is Norman Talbot, who observes that ‘we feel certain the destination must be either Oxford or his beloved Kelmscott’.  Let us suppose, as a thought-experiment, that it were Oxford, that Morris’s characters disembark in the university city and do not travel further upriver. 


Would News from Nowhere be a better utopia if it had ended in Oxford, a place, we must suppose, of continuing mental energy rather than of the outdoor harvest work of Kelmscott itself?  Morris would then have had the chance to show us in detail what a communist university looks like, just as Ernest Callenbach sketches the lineaments of an ecological research institute in his Ecotopia of 1975.  We might have met some of the scientists who had developed those enigmatic but technologically advanced ‘force-vehicles’ that Guest and his fellow-travellers have seen on the Thames.  A post-revolutionary Oxford certainly might have suited Ellen nicely, given her own intellectual liveliness and taste for long historical perspectives.  She might successfully have reintegrated herself into Nowherian life here, after the spell of isolation with her grandfather at Runnymede.


 We may even speculate as to whether the time-travelling William Guest might not have been able to remain in utopia if the book had ended in Oxford rather than Kelmscott.  Might not the transfigured university have afforded him the chance of becoming a lecturer in Victorian history in the way that Edward Bellamy’s narrator Julian West does in Looking Backward, where he ends up teaching in the Historical Section of Shawmutt College in the future Boston of that socialist utopia?  Ellen notes that Guest is too wrapped up in his endless past-present contrast to fully belong to the younger utopians in the Kelmscott fields, but this might have been the very quality that would make him a vividly firsthand history lecturer at Oxford.


Indeed, the benefits of ending in Oxford might have been felt not just by Guest, but by News from Nowhere itself.  For one recurrent objection to Morris’s utopia is that it is excessively pastoral, too placid and idyllic, too dismissive of intellectual debate and scientific innovation.   To have closed in a university city rather than among the fields of Kelmscott would have made that charge against the book much harder to sustain.  Someone should surely write a new version of News from Nowhere in which Oxford is its terminus.

 

Wednesday, 21 April 2021

Air Quality in London

Clean air is among the earliest pleasures of Morris’s transfigured socialist London in News from Nowhere.  ‘My first feeling was a delicious relief caused by the fresh air,’ remarks William Guest soon after waking at the Hammersmith Guest House; and he quickly grasps the social cause of the vastly improved air quality around him: ‘The soap-works with their smoke-vomiting chimneys were gone’.

You might have thought that, in the hundred and thirty-years since the publication of Morris’s utopia, British capitalism would have got its environmental act together as regards London air quality.  In some ways, yes; we don’t have Victorian ‘pea-soupers’ in the capital any longer.  But in others, very definitely not.  

So we must be grateful to Philip Barlow, the coroner at the inquest into the death by air pollution of nine-year-old Ella Kissi-Debrah.  For he has pointed out that UK pollution limits for particulate matter are currently twice as high as the levels recommended by the World Health Organisation, and has demanded that they be reduced down to those WHO levels (which themselves may well not be safe).  Fortunately for London’s children, mayor Sadiq Khan, himself an asthma sufferer, does seem inclined to act to reduce car use and traffic pollution in the metropolis.

The wager of Morris’s utopia is that reformist impulses of this kind will never ultimately be enough, and that only major systemic social change can bring about an economically and environmentally just future.  However, until then, air quality is one of a host of London-specific issues (Thames water or the quality of new housing developments would be others), which the William Morris Society could very readily be campaigning about without jeopardising its legal status as a charity.

 

 

Tuesday, 30 March 2021

William Morris at Verso

William Morris for the Corbynistas?  That is the way in which, in his general Introduction, Owen Hatherley pitches Owen Holland’s new collection of Morris’s political writings, which (as far as I can recall) is the first sustained attention the leftwing publisher Verso has paid to Morris since Perry Anderson’s fine chapter on ‘Utopias’ in his Arguments within English Marxism (1980).

Hatherley evokes ‘our current moment, when the first attempt in many decades to crash Socialism into Parliament has comprehensively failed, leaving a generation of young socialists bitterly angry and disorientated’.  They could, accordingly, ‘do much worse than turn to these serene, wise and humane essays, and they may find a vision of socialism that appeals to them in particular’.


 Yet it’s noteworthy that Hatherley, as a self-declared ‘modernist’, has some significant problems with Morris’s socialism.  ‘There are certain ideas of “nature” and “manliness” that are sometimes now hard to take”, and he feels more tempted by the realm of culture and media – ‘a Victorian theatre or a 1930s cinema’ – than Morris’s vision of nature and ‘fields in general’.  Hence he prefers Oscar Wilde’s inflection of Morris’s ideas to Morris tout court (since ‘socialism should have space for perverts’), and he refers rather dismissively to News from Nowhere as a ‘retro-utopia’.

Still, there is also much here to be grateful for: the emphasis on Morris’s vision of the social totality, on his clear-sighted diagnosis of reformism, and the unashamed and celebratory use of the term ‘communism’ for Morris’s overall political vision (this last is true of both editors, incidentally).  So we should all be glad to have this volume, which will replace our ancient, increasingly tattered copies of A.L. Morton’s Political Writings of William Morris (1973).  About time too!