data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/773de/773defaea67322d252458b79d78617e9f278c66a" alt=""
The Howard drawing is surrounded by the Tullie’s Pre-Raphaelite collection, which is a matter of interesting oddments (such as an unfinished version of Rossetti’s Found from 1854 or Arthur Hughes’s tiny ink-on-paper La Belle Dame Sans Merci of 1862) rather than major holdings. But Morris in 1875 was no longer in any straightforward sense a Pre-Raphaelite. He had made the two Iceland trips, reorganised the Firm, was working on Sigurd the Volsung, and would soon become treasurer of the Eastern Question Association and founder of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. So as I peered close up at the Howard drawing was it fanciful to detect a new, middle-aged determination and steeliness behind those spectacles? Was I responding to what was genuinely in the aesthetic object before me, or projecting what, historically, I know is to come and what, politically, I want to come?
3 comments:
well, it is there in the drawing but maybe it's not you who are retrospectively projecting but George Howard who was responding to WM's changed and significant move into public life - EQA and SPAB specific issue campaigns that came before the move towards national politics.
Dear Jan, thanks for the confirmation! I should have mentioned that Tullie House has lots of other good things beside its Pre-Raphaelites. I was particularly struck by William Rothenstein's eerie painting of 'Wych-Elm in Winter' (1919), which has a very different feel to E.M. Forster's cosy use of the wych-elm symbolism in 'Howard's End'.
michael kors handbags
huaraches
yeezy boost 350
kobe byrant shoes
yeezy boost 350 v2
valentino
calvin klein outlet
goyard handbags
ralph lauren uk
retro jordans
Post a Comment