The US
Democratic Party establishment has now paid the highest of all electoral prices
for previously sabotaging the candidacy of veteran socialist Bernie Sanders in
favour of such a deeply compromised neo-liberal insider as Hillary
Clinton. At moments of deep national
crisis and self-division, if you do not offer working-class voters a leftwing
populism, you will tend to get a populism of the right – and sometimes the far right – instead, as we
ourselves recently saw with the Brexit vote.
Donald Trump appealed to an American working class which has lost out so
deeply to globalisation, with many of its traditional manufacturing jobs
exported overseas, and waves of mass immigration undercutting its grasp on the
remaining low-wage service jobs at home.
Can left-liberalism, or even the metropolitan Left itself, simply not see the truth in such arguments, or how deeply they accord with the experience of the US “rustbelt” or of our own working-class neighbourhoods? Good as he is on many other policies, Jeremy Corbyn clearly doesn’t have a clue on this, as when he announced recently, of EU immigration to London, “I don’t think too many have come”. Until we have a Left politics that can actually tap into contemporary working-class anxieties, as Sanders in his campaign to be Democratic presidential nominee did indeed seem to be doing, it will be the Right – Trump in the US, the Tory hard-Brexiteers or UKIP over here – that capitalises on the very profound disaffection with the current world economic system that so clearly exists.
Can left-liberalism, or even the metropolitan Left itself, simply not see the truth in such arguments, or how deeply they accord with the experience of the US “rustbelt” or of our own working-class neighbourhoods? Good as he is on many other policies, Jeremy Corbyn clearly doesn’t have a clue on this, as when he announced recently, of EU immigration to London, “I don’t think too many have come”. Until we have a Left politics that can actually tap into contemporary working-class anxieties, as Sanders in his campaign to be Democratic presidential nominee did indeed seem to be doing, it will be the Right – Trump in the US, the Tory hard-Brexiteers or UKIP over here – that capitalises on the very profound disaffection with the current world economic system that so clearly exists.
7 comments:
You're probably right about the bigger issues, Tony, but you should not forget the disastrous role played by Huma Abedin, the senior Clinton aide who, by not earlier revealing under oath all the electronic gadgets on which relevant e-mails were stored, allowed the FBI to re-open its investigation into Clinton e-mails at such a sensitive electoral moment. Dubbed by Hillary her "second daughter", Abedin has actually proved a complete catastrophe for the Democratic campaign.
Yes, poor Abedin - she really damaged her boss's campaign! On the lessons for the Left of Donald Trump's success, see the good piece in today's Guardian newspaper by Owen Jones: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/10/the-left-needs-a-new-populism-fast
And Bernie Sanders has his say here: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/10/bernie-sanders-donald-trump-harnessed-anti-establishment-anger
More Sanders reflections: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/13/bernie-sanders-democratic-party-progressives-grassroots
sanders was seen as too extreme by those working class communities - there's no way he could 've won- same with Corbyn. The central issue is lack of education as most go along with emotion not intellect
Donald Trump appealed to an American working class that has suffered greatly as a result of globalization, with many of its traditional manufacturing industries being outsourced overseas and waves of mass immigration undermining its hold on the country's remaining low-wage service jobs.
---------------------
Gmail Bellen
Post a Comment